POPULATION GENETICS FOR ANIMAL CONSERVATION

International Workshop, Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy, September 4-6, 2003

Programme
List of Posters
Abstracts
Addresses
Organizers and Committees

Go to the workshop page at CEA

(Click here to find the names of the  people in the picture)







PROGRAMME (LMC = Last Minute Change)

Wednesday, September 3

15.00-19.30

Registration

19.30

Welcome dinner

Thursday, September 4

7.30-8.00

Breakfast

8.30

Opening address

Methods&Theory I: Invited presentations - Chairman: Giorgio Bertorelle

9.00-10.00

Laurent Excoffier Recovery of the history of a species' spatial expansion from molecular diversity (A1)

10.00-11.00

David Posada Network methods for intraspecific phylogenies and nested clade analysis  (A2)

11.00-11.30

Coffee break

11.30-12.30

Mark Beaumont Some applications of Bayesian modelling and data analysis in Conservation Genetics (A3)

12.30

Lunch

Methods&Theory II: Invited presentations - Chairman: Cristiano Vernesi

15.00-15-45

Eric Anderson Bayesian methods for inferring population structure, hybridization, and migration using multilocus genetic data (A4)

15.45-16.30

Peter Beerli Inference of population parameters using the coalescence (A5)

16.30-17.00

Coffee break

17.00-17.45

Oscar Gaggiotti Statistical methods for the study of metapopulation processes: Integrating genetic and non-genetic data (A6)

17.45-18.30

Gordon Luikart Statistical and population genomic approaches in conservation genetics: Many methods, much potential uncertain utility (A7)

19.30

Dinner

from 21.00

Practical software session (sign up and indicate who would you like to contact)

Friday, September 5

7.30-8.00

Breakfast

Case Studies: Invited presentations - Chairman: Ettore Randi

9.00-9.30

Valerio Sbordoni Population genetics issues in conservation and management of fish and butterflies (A8)

9.30-10.00

Gisella Caccone Can genetic studies help to ensure the survival of the last giant tortoises on earth? (A9)

10.00-10.30

Michel Milinkovitch Genetic analysis of a successful repatriation program: Giant Galápagos tortoises (A10)

10.30-11.00

Coffee break

11.00-11.30

Robert Fleischer Genetic methods and avian conservation: bottlenecks, fragmentation and conservation units (A11)

11.30-12.00

Giorgio Bertorelle Patterns of genetic variation at micro-geographic scales in five mammals in the Italian Alps, with management implications (A12)

12.00-12.30

Mike Bruford Population genetics, conservation and management of primates (A13)

12.30

Lunch

Participant session I – Chairman: Mike Bruford

14.30-14.45

Carlos Largiadčr The use of cDNA microarrays for studying local adaptation in natural animal populations (A14)

14.45-15.00

Dave Coltman Using molecular markers to study quantitative genetic variation in the wild (A15)

15.00-15.15

Adrian Munguía Vega MHC genes on the history and conservation of the rare porpoise Vaquita (A16)

15.15-15.30

Massimo Pierpaoli Felis silvestris: taxonomic distinction between subspecies, hybridisation and population structure in Europe (A17) LMC: Paper presented by Ettore Randi

15.30-15.45

John Carlos Garza Population Structure and History of Steelhead Trout in California (A18)

15.45-16.00

Claudio Ciofi Population genetics and management of wild and captive populations of giant reptiles (A19)

16.00.16.15

Robin Moritz Estimating the number of colonies in populations of social insects from microsatellite DNA data. An example on Asian Apis species (A20) LMC: Paper presented by Bernhard Kraus

16.15-16.45

Coffee break

Participant session II – Chairman: Claudio Chemini

16.45-17.00

Manuel Ruedi Population genetics and conservation of the Azorean bat (Nyctalus azoreum) (A21)

17.00-17.15

Pierre Berthier Bayesian estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients from multi-locus genotypes (A22)

17.15-17.30

Youssef Idaghdour Gene flow in great bustard populations across the Straits of Gibraltar as elucidated from excremental PCR and mtDNA sequencing (A23) LMC: Canceled and replaced by Jeroen Van Houdt Identifying native brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) by means of RAPD and mitochondrial DNA (A53)

17.30-17.45

Elizabeth Hadly Variable genetic response of two small mammals to late Holocene climatic change (A24)

17.45-18.00

David Tallmon Effective population size estimation using approximate Bayesian methods with summary statistics. (A25) LMC: Canceled and replaced by Andrea Gandolfi Genetic diversity and population structure of Artic char, Salvelinus alpinus, from Trentino (Italy) (A54)

18.00-18.15

Peter Galbusera Out of equilibrium after recent habitat fragmentation: can population demographic changes be predicted from species-specific mobility? (A26)

18.15-18.30

Manuel Ruiz-Garcia Bayesian and coalescence analyses reveal extreme different genetic trajectories and structures in two neotropical superpredators: the cases of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) and of the jaguar (Panthera onca) (A27) LMC: Paper presented by Diana Alvarez

19.30

Dinner

from 21.00

Practical software session (sign up and indicate who would you like to contact)

Saturday, September 6

7.30-8.00

Breakfast

General Topics, Trends and Controversies: Invited presentations - Chairman: Valerio Sbordoni

8.30-9.00

Michel Milinkovitch A critical examination of network methods and rooting procedures (A28)

9.00-9.30

Craig Primmer Associations between individual genetic diversity and fitness related traits in endangered salmon and trout populations (A29)

9.30-10.00

Louis Bernatchez Challenges in assessing genetic biodiversity: an empirical illustration through recent research on salmonid fishes (A30)

10.00-10.30

Kathryn Rodríguez-Clark Relationships between genetic variation and phenotypic 'success': is more variation better? (A31)

10.30

Coffee break

11.00-11.30

Ettore Randi Population, conservation genetics and management of game species (A32)

11.30-12.00

Gordon Luikart Origins and conservation of domesticated livestock (A33)

12.00-12.30

Phillip Morin Trends in conservation genetics: changes and advances in molecular marker applications (A34)

12.30

Lunch

Participant session III - Chairman: Heidi Hauffe

14.30-14.45

Rus Hoelzel Male and female dispersal behaviour, and the population genetics of marine mammal species  (A35)

14.45-15.00

Walter Salzburger The use of network tree approaches for phylogeography and conservation  (A36)

15.00-15.15

Peter Wandeler  Temporal population genetics in a red fox population following a rabies epidemic (A37)

15.15-15.30

Deusdedith Ishengoma Non-invasive determination of genetic diversity and paternity analysis of African elephant (Loxodonta africana) using genomic DNA micrisatellite markers (A38)

15.30-15.45

Gernot Segelbacher From isolation to connectivity - conservation genetics of capercaillie  (A39)

15.45-16.00

Carles Vilŕ Two hundred years in the history of Scandinavian wolves: decline and recovery  (A40)

16.00-17.00

Discussion and Conclusions

17.15

Wine-tasting and Workshop dinner

Sunday, September 7

7.30-8.00

Breakfast


LIST OF POSTERS

 

Koban E, Özkan E, Altunok V, Nizamlıoğlu M, Soysal İ, Bruford MW and Togan İ

Genetic diversity within and among Turkish sheep breeds, their domestication histories and conservation (A41)

 

Baus E, Darrock D and Bruford MW

Genetic diversity, reproduction and population viability in Lusitanian sea stars (A42)

 

Beja-Pereira A, Ferrand N, Ertugrul O, Ouragh L and Luikart G

Two African origins and extremely weak population structure in donkeys revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequencing (A43)

 

Formia A and Bruford MW

Mixed stock analysis using Bayesian methods: a green turtle feeding ground in the Gulf of Guinea (A44)

 

Gum B, Gross R, Rottmann O, Schroeder W and Kuehn R

Population genetic structure of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) in Bavaria, southern Germany: implications for conservation (A45)

 

Mikulíček P and Piálek J

Natural hybridization and introgression of Triturus cristatus genetic traits into Triturus carnifex in the northern part of its range (A46)

 

Ogden R, McEwing R and Shuttleworth C

Conservation genetics of the red squirrel, Scirius vulgaris, in a refugial population on Anglesey, North Wales (A47)

 

Pierpaoli M, Putrella A, Sammarone L, Posillico M and Randi E

Individual identification of brown bear (Ursus arctos) from central Italy using non-invasive genetic sampling (A48)

 

Regnaut S, Evanno G and Goudet J

When, why and how to use the Structure software: a simulation study (A49)

 

Dubey S, Ursenbacher S, Pellet J and Fumagalli P

Genetic structure of the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) metapopulation in western Switzerland (A50)

 

Nembrini M, Regnaut S, Ursenbacher S and Fumagalli L

Conservation genetic of the Viperine Snake (Natrix maura, Colubridae) in its northeastern distribution area (A51)

 

Vähä J-P, Erkinaro J and Primmer CR

Genetic discrimination between wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the world’s most productive Atlantic salmon river system (A52)

 


ABSTRACTS

 

A1

The signature of a range expansion on population molecular diversity

Laurent Excoffier, Grant Hamilton

University of Bern, Switzerland

It has been long recognized that population demographic expansions lead to distinctive features in the molecular diversity of populations. However, recent simulation results suggested that a distinction could be made between a pure demographic expansion in an unsubdivided population, and a range expansion in a subdivided population, both leading to a large increase in the total number of the individuals. In order to better characterize the effect of a range expansion, we derive the distribution of the number of mutation differences between pairs of genes (the mismatch distribution), the heterozygosity, the average number of pairwise difference, and the fixation index FST after an instantaneous range expansion in an infinite-island model. These derivations are shown by simulation to lead to results qualitatively similar to those one would obtain after a range expansion in a 2-dimensional stepping-stone model. How these results can be used to estimate the parameters of the range expansion (timing, size increase, immigration rate) is discussed. An importance-sampling procedure for estimating underlying range expansion parameters is also introduced.

 

A2

Network methods for intraspecific phylogenies and nested clade analysis

David Posada

University of Vigo, Spain

Phylogenetic relationships at the intraspecific level entail some particular features. Within species, it is common to find genealogical multifurcations, reticulation and persistent ancestral nodes. Often, traditional phylogenetic approaches like maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and distance methods are not able to display properly this information. Phylogenetic networks methods have been developed to take into account these particularities. Also, the temporal information encoded in these intraspecific phylogenies can be used to separate population patterns and processes. The nested clade analysis provides a statistical phylogeographic framework to differentiate, in space and time, recurrent events like gene flow or system of mating, from historical events like fragmentations or range expansions. Such a method presents some advantages and disadvantages that will be discussed here.

 

A3

Some applications of Bayesian modelling and data analysis in Conservation Genetics

Mark A. Beaumont

School of Animal and Microbial Sciences,University of Reading

This talk will give a brief overview of likelihood-based and, specifically, Bayesian, inference in conservation genetics. I will then talk about three current areas of research that interest me.

First, the general problem of estimating changes in past population size using microsatellite data, including a discussion of the effects of population structure, wrong demographic models, and wrong mutation models. Secondly, the use of approximate Bayesian computation based on summary statistic methods, and how these may have wide application to conservation problems. Third, I will discuss recent collaborative work on Bayesian model-based methods for assessing the degree of adaptive divergence of populations based on genome scans.

 

A4

Bayesian methods for inferring population structure, hybridization, and migration using multilocus genetic data

Eric Anderson

University of California, Berkeley, USA

Conservation of threatened populations and management of invasive species can be facilitated by knowledge of population structure, hybridization, and migration.  Three closely related methods for inferring these population features and processes have been developed in the last three years and implemented in the freely available software programs, Structure (Pritchard et al., 2000), NewHybrids (Anderson & Thompson, 2002), and BayesAss (Wilson & Rannala, 2003). The statistical models underlying these three methods are remarkably similar, with subtle, but important, differences.  I will begin by briefly reviewing each of these methods, using the language of graphical models to point out their similarities. Then, I will emphasize the differences between the methods which dictate what types of sampling scenarios, time scales, and population structures each method is best suited to. Since all three approaches use Bayesian methods and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling to estimate parameters, I will discuss issues of sensitivity to prior distributions assumed for the models and problems of poor mixing of the Markov chains.  The latter will be discussed in the context of a short demonstration of the data-visualization capabilities of the program NewHybrids.

 

A5

Inference of population parameters using the coalescence

Peter Beerli

University of Washington, Seattle, USA

Conservation biology is dependent on accurate description of present and past population parameters, such as population size and migration rate between subpopulations among others. In recent years coalescence theory revitalized population genetics and several groups developed methods to infer population genetics parameters allowing for a variety of complications such as unequal migration rates, and changing population size. My talk will give a short overview about the coalescent, and discuss how these methods can not only be used to infer traditional parameters but they also allow to compare migration models and explore effects of missed populations in a rigid maximum likelihood framework and that they might even be effective in estimating parameters of subpopulation where one cannot gather data.

 

A6

Statistical methods for the study of metapopulation processes: Integrating genetic and non-genetic data

Oscar Gaggiotti

University of Helsinki, Finland

Dispersal is one of the fundamental processes in metapopulation biology. The use of purely ecological approaches such as mark-release-recapture methods is time consuming and can only be used on a limited number of species. Population genetic methods, on the other hand, are of more general applicability. Some studies have used them to identify the source populations that contributed individuals to newly colonised habitat patches. However, it is also possible to go beyond the simple estimation of parameters and test hypothesis about the factors that control colonisation processes. This requires the integration of genetic and non-genetic data, which is achieved using a Bayesian approach. In my lecture I will first present a brief review of studies that have used genetic data to infer colonisation patterns. I will then introduce Bayesian methods that integrate multilocus genetic data with other sources of information in order to make inferences about the factors that control colonisation processes.

 

A7

To be announced

Gordon Luikart

University of Grenoble, France

 

A8

Population genetics issues in conservation and management of fish and butterflies

Valerio Sbordoni

University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy

In this talk I shall attempt to highlight some issues that are seldom considered in the conventional context of the “conservation genetics” and that, in my view, demand more awareness to broaden and emphasize the role of population genetics as a helpful tool in the conservation and management of biodiversity. Still today the wide majority of studies in conservation are focused on endangered species of mammals, birds and reptiles. However the scope of conservation biology is not only that one to protect endangered species and habitats, but also that one of preserving the genetic diversity and the ecological and evolutionary processes to which they are connected. This is particularly important when attempts are done to bring together the scope of conservation to the needs of a sustainable use of biodiversity. I shall present a few examples based on invertebrates, namely butterflies and cave dwelling organisms, and fish. In the context of conservation, invertebrates are significant for several reasons. They represent the very core of biodiversity. Many invertebrates are umbrella species, strictly depending upon the whole community health and some of them can show immediate responses to environmental changes, namely to global climate changes. Compared to most vertebrates, invertebrates are more finely tuned with landscape features, particularly at small geographical scale. Provided that mapping biodiversity is an important challenge for the forthcoming years, invertebrates appear to be in pole position to represent the main descriptors in biodiversity maps. I guess that in the future invertebrates will play a major role in research in the newly established field of Landscape Genetics, linking metapopulation concepts to environmental planning of fragmented habitats. On the other hand, fish are important to outline problems of sustainable harvest from natural populations and aquaculture that are intimately interconnected with conservation of genetic resources. The demise of salmon and trout in the western United States has become a conservation crisis of enormous biological, economical, and political significance. The need for management of salmonid stocks has therefore stimulated a huge amount of research in the field. Besides lessons from salmonids, I shall discuss a study case concerning sea bass where a complex life history combined with historical changes of the coastline in the Mediterranean Sea produced a genetic structuring of populations and a complex assortment of genotypes that has been understood only by using proper markers. Results from this study emphasize the importance of contrasting neutral vs. adaptive markers, since they tell different histories on population structure suggesting appropriate strategies for conservation and management of sea bass and, possibly, other catadromous fish.

 

A9

Can genetic studies help to ensure the survival of the last giant tortoises on earth?

Gisella Caccone

Yale University, New Haven, USA

In the past eight years I have been working together with a large international team of scientists on the evolutionary genetics of the two last giant tortoises on earth, the Galapagos and Aldabra tortoises. For the Giant Galápagos Tortoise (Geochelone nigra), we have amassed a collection of over 3000 blood samples from the remaining natural populations as well as some samples from captive animals of unknown origin, and bone and skin samples from extinct populations.  Our genetic work on this collection has consisted of both mtDNA and nuclear intron sequencing, plus microsatellite analysis. We have derived a fairly good understanding of many aspects of the history of this group including its phylogeny and phylogeographic history combined with geological knowledge of the formation of the islands. We are defining genetically distinct populations (taxa) and determining levels of gene flow among them. Similarly, we have been studying the evolutionary origin of the only extant tortoises in the Indian Ocean, the Aldabra tortoise, Geochelone dussumerii, an trying to evaluate levels of genetic diversity and its evolutionary relationships to other extant and extinct tortoises from the Indian Ocean. These data have been used to understand the history of the group but also to help develop conservation strategies. I will present several examples of how genetic data are used in these giant reptiles to develop management strategies for captive and wild populations based on a multidisciplinary approach.

 

A10

Genetic analysis of a successful repatriation program: Giant Galápagos tortoises

Michel C. Milinkovitch*, Daniel Monteyne*, James P. Gibbs†,

Thomas H Fritts§, Washington Tapia, Howard L. Snell§‡, Ralph Tiedemann**,

Adalgisa Caccone††, and Jeffrey R. Powell††

* Free University of Brussels, Gosselies, Belgium; † State University of New York, Syracuse, NY; § Charles Darwin Foundation, Galápagos National Park Service, Puerto Ayora, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador; ‡ University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; ** University of Potsdam, Golm, Germany; †† Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

As natural populations of endangered species dwindle to precarious levels, remaining members are sometimes brought into captivity, allowed to breed, and their offspring returned to the natural habitat.  One goal of such repatriation programs is to retain as much of the genetic variation of the species as is possible.  A taxon of giant Galápagos tortoises on the island of Espańola has been the subject of a captive breeding-repatriation program for 33 years.  Core breeders, consisting of 12 females and three males, have produced more than 1200 offspring that have been released on Espańola where in situ reproduction has recently been observed.  Using microsatellite DNA markers, we have determined the maternity and paternity of 132 repatriated offspring.  Contributions of the breeders are highly skewed.  This has led to a further loss of genetic variation that is detrimental to the long-term survival of the population.  Modifications to the breeding program could alleviate this problem.

 

A11

Genetic methods and avian conservation:  bottlenecks, fragmentation and conservation units

Robert Fleischer

National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, USA

Genetic methods can be applied to issues of avian conservation in a variety of ways. Neutral genetic markers can be used to assess inbreeding levels, genetic variation, population structure and phylogenetic or conservation units. Non-neutral genetic systems can be useful for assessing the potential adaptability of a population to environmental change or translocation. Birds are thought to be more coarse-grained in associations with their environment, and so local adaptation may not be considered as much of a factor as with invertebrates or plants. Endangered bird populations can become highly fragmented and decrease to very low levels, and ensuing genetic bottlenecks could impact fitness. However, flight provides most birds with greater powers of dispersal and thus gene flow is higher and may mitigate these impacts. Interactions with infectious disease may be one of the greatest conservation problems facing birds, as evidenced by introduced pathogens (malaria, pox) in Hawaii and West Nile Virus in the U.S. I discuss how genetic analyses may be used to provide information relevant to conservation and management, and provide several case studies for illustration.

 

A12

Patterns of genetic variation at micro-geographic scales in five mammals in the Italian Alps, with management implications

Giorgio Bertorelle (1), Elena Pecchioli (1, 2), Barbara Crestanello (1, 2), Francesca Davoli (2), David Caramelli (3), Cristiano Vernesi (1), Heidi Hauffe (2)

1. Department of Biology, University of Ferrara, Italy

2. Centre for Alpine Ecology, Trento, Italy

3. BIOSFERA – Conservation Biology Research and Education, Florence, Italy

Using sequence variation at the mitochondrial control region (D-loop) and allele frequencies at ten microsatellite nuclear markers, we analyzed patterns of genetic variation in five mammals species in the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy): chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), red deer (Cervus elaphus), European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) and mountain hare (Lepus timidus). All these game species are presently widespread throughout the Province; however, they suffered a strong size reduction in the last century as a result of a remarkable transformation in land use and over-exploitation. Subsequent, uncontrolled restocking have probably also affected the native populations and their genetic composition. For all five species, at least four different samples were considered, each consisting of about 25 specimens, collected from populations separated by geographic distances of between 20 and 100 kilometers. Genetic divergence can be observed even at this micro-geographic scale. The relationship between the patterns of genetic variation, the ecological characteristics of the different species, and the estimated levels of anthropogenic impact in the sampling areas, is discussed.

 

A13

Population genetics, conservation and management of primates

Mike Bruford

University of Cardiff, UK

The study of primate social structures has occupied ecologists and anthropologists for decades. New molecular markers and the necessary statistical framework to analyse molecular data has already had a large impact on this discipline. We are now able to investigate questions that could in many cases not satisfactorily be answered with previous approaches. For example, paternity analysis allows the determination of reproductive success for specific individuals or specific reproductive tactics and therefore contributes to a large extent to our understanding of sexual selection and reproductive strategies of the sexes. Kinship analysis enables us to investigate the evolution of social behaviour and cooperation, the differential impact of relatedness on the quality of social relationships and the risks and avoidance strategies of inbreeding. By employing non-invasive techniques of sampling we can remotely monitor natural populations. We can follow individuals and social units over time and space and can reconstruct life-history strategies such as natal and breeding dispersal. Finally, we can measure the genetic differentiation in neighboring social groups and the amount of gene flow among them and other populations.

The broad applications of these new molecular techniques will develop their full potential through the synergistic effects that emerge from the collaboration between two disciplines, molecular ecology and behavioral ecology. Only the knowledge of long-term socio-ecological and behavioral data collected in natural populations allows us to fully interpret the genetical data and vice versa. Using three examples from recent primate studies in our laboratory to exemplify studies of paternity, dispersal and demographic structure I will discuss these approaches and identify problems and prospects for such analysis in the medium term.

 

A14

The use of cDNA microarrays for studying local adaptation in natural animal populations

Carlos Largiadčr(1), T Giger(1), PJR Day(2) Laurent Excoffier(1)

1 University of Bern, Switzerland

2 Centre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK

The cDNA microarray technology has been emerging as a powerful tool to monitor gene expression of thousands of genes simultaneously. The technology has been indeed developed as a search tool for candidate genes rather than to investigate the evolutionary significance of gene expression diversity itself. In particular, individual gene expression diversity has been so far considered as a nuisance parameter that has often been ignored, for instance by pooling RNA-samples of several individuals. However, the fundamental unit of the evolutionary process is the individual. Any selection process acting on levels of gene expression is thus fuelled by inter-individual differences, which are therefore of central importance for studying local adaptation. We shall discuss how to take into account gene expression variability at the level of individuals in experimental design and in statistical analyses in general, showing that already existing statistical methodologies can be adapted to analyze cDNA microarray data. These methodologies will be applied to the particular case of investigating possible genetic determinants of local adaptation in freshwater fish populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta).

 

A15

Using molecular markers to study quantitative genetic variation in the wild

Dave Coltman

University of Sheffield, UK

Traits underlying fitness and adaptation to changing environmental conditions are generally quantitative in nature. A quantitative genetic approach is therefore the mot direct avenue towards a better understanding of the adaptive potential of populations that are under conservation threat. Inferences about genetic variances can be made using either analytical methods based on molecular pedigrees or through marker-regression techniques that consider the covariance of trait similarity and inferred relatedness. The relative merits of these approaches are compared using empirical data from two wild ungulate populations. We estimated the heritabilities of life-history and morphometric traits related to fitness using microsatellite based pedigree and relatedness estimates from bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis; Ram Mountain, Canada) and alpine ibex (Capra ibex; Parco Gran Paradiso, Italy). Pedigree-based analyses using an “animal model” approach generated significant heritability estimates with considerably less error than regression-based estimators.

 

A16

MHC genes on the history and conservation of the rare porpoise Vaquita

Adrian Munguía Vega(1), RS Flores(2), JR Vazquez(1), BL Rojas(3)

1 Marine Pathology Department, CIBNOR, La Paz, Mexico

2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology, Marine Biology Department, UABCS, La Paz, BCS, Mexico

3 Programa Nacional de Mamíferos Marinos, CICESE, Km 107 Carretera Ensenada–Tijuana, Ensenada, BC, Mexico

The Vaquita, Phocoena sinus, is an endemic and endangered porpoise restricted to the Upper Gulf of California, Mexico. The unique population is estimated to be less than 600 individuals,  and has been subject of an incidental mortality in fishnets at least since 1940’s. Molecules of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) play a key role in the immune response of vertebrates. We studied the single stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of a DNA fragment corresponding to the Pepetide Binding Region (PBR) of a MHC locus. All individuals (n=25) showed to be homozygous for a single allele at the DQB locus analyzed, which along with a lack of polymorphism in the mitochondrial control region previously assesed, indicated a striking high degree of relatedness between the members of this wild population. This results translates in a high susceptibility to novel pathogens. Different analitic and computer demographic scenerios were simulated, and the results indicated a likely historic efective population size  of Ne ~500 at least during the last 10-15,000 years, that is only about twice the actual value (Ne ~250). This results support the population was founded perhaps by few individuals during one of the glacial periods of the Pleistoscene, constituing a historically small population that shows some inbreeding related anormalities such as polydactyly present in all the specimens analyzed so far. Althought, the population might have already purged those deleterious alleles of higher effect preventing the species to suffer from inbreeding depression, in contrast to some naturally abundant populations recently reduced to low numbers.

 

A17

Felis silvestris: taxonomic distinction between subspecies, hybridisation and population structure in Europe.

Massimo Pierpaoli(1), L Lapini(2), B Ragni(3), F Vercillo(3), Ettore Randi(1)

1 Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica (INFS), Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy

2 Friulian Museum of Natural History, via Marangoni, 39 – 41, 33100 Udine, Italy

3 Department of Animals Biology and Ecology, University of Perugia, via Elce di Sotto, 06123 Perugia, Italy

The European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) is widely distributed through the continent with fragmented and isolated populations. The subspecies F. s. libyca has been introduced by humans in Sardinia. The domestic cat is widespread in Europe and is virtually sympatric with wildcats almost everywhere. Domestic and wildcats can hybridise in the wild, the hybrids are fertile and introgressed individuals can very difficult to detect using morphological traits. Hybridisation could be one of the major threats to the integrity of the wildcat gene pool. The unavailability of pure populations of wildcats to be used for taxonomic purposes, made very difficult any attempt to identify hybrid populations and/or hybrid individuals. Recently the application to population genetics of Bayesian statistics, coupled with the availability of data from highly variable microsatellite markers, offered a new and fruitful approach to solve this problem. Wild and domestic cats were sampled in Italy, Germany, Belgium, Hungary, Bulgaria, Portugal, Scotland and Switzerland. Moreover a number of known hybrids, obtained through crosses in captivity, was added as a control. A set of 12 unlinked microsatellites was used for the genetic screening. First or second generation hybrids could be detected by Bayesian admixture analysis. Results suggest that hybridisation may be widespread in some populations, while it is absent or marginal in other. Finally, the genetic structure of local wildcat populations is discussed.

 

A18

Population structure and history of Steelhead Trout in California

John Carlos Garza(1,2), R Williams(2)

1 NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Santa Cruz Laboratory, USA

2 University of California Santa Cruz, Institute of Marine Sciences, USA

Steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are the most wide-spread of the anadromous Pacific salmonids, ranging naturally from Southern California in the US to Russia. In California, most populations of steelhead are under protection of the US Endangered Species Act. Genetic population structure and demographic history of coastal steelhead trout populations in California are investigated using data from 18 microsatellite loci and samples collected from more than 60 sites, covering almost the entire range of the species in coastal California. The importance of such data in Endangered Species Act recovery efforts will also be outlined. An improvement to a previously published method for detecting recent reductions in effective population size using population genetic data will also be presented, and the performance of three methods will be compared. Error rates, recovery times, and effects of migration are examined. The results emphasize the importance of using multiple methods and suggest a way to detect migration into the focal population. A method for estimating the number of alleles lost due to a reduction in population size will also be presented.

 

A19

Population genetics and management of wild and captive populations of giant reptiles

Claudio Ciofi(1,2), A Caccone(2), JR Powell(1)

1 Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven USA

2 Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies, Yale University, New Haven, USA

Description of population genetic structure is an important parameter to consider in wildlife recovery initiatives. It is particularly relevant to the conservation of island endemics that have endured both direct and indirect threats associated with human activities. Augmentation programs, for instance, can greatly benefit from knowledge of the genetic relationships of both natural populations and captive stocks. Examples are here provided from DNA studies of two reptile species, the Galápagos giant tortoise and the Komodo monitor. In the first case, reconstruction of the evolutionary history of populations in different volcanic areas is likely to impact management decisions for in situ breeding programs. Similarly, genetic analysis of wild and captive individuals can help determine the origin of monitor lizards in ex situ breeding facilities, obtain missing pedigree data, and therefore provide information for appropriate pairings and augmentation plans.

 

A20

Estimating the number of colonies in populations of social insects from microsatellite DNA data. An example on Asian Apis species

Robin FA Moritz(1), N Koeniger(2), FB Kraus(1)

1 Institute of Zoology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

2 Institut für Bienenkunde Oberursel, Karl-von-Frisch-Weg 2, 61440 Oberursel, Germany

In honeybee populations (like in other social insects) primarily the number of colonies rather than the actual number of individuals in the population determines the effective population size. Often only few colonies provide the majority of the males (Kraus et al. 2003) which causes small effective population sizes in spite of large numbers of individuals in the population. The estimation of the number of colonies which contribute to the male gene pool is therefore a crucial parameter for honeybee conservation. We here present a method where microsatellite DNA genotype data of worker samples from colonies can be used to estimate the number of drone contributing colonies in the population. A cluster analysis which is based on the allelic identity by descent (AID) among drone genotypes is used to group potential brother drones. For each “brother cluster” the corresponding mother queen genotype is determined by Mendelian  inference. We show in various simulations that although limited number of screened loci can result in slightly biased estimates the precision improves considerably with increasing number of loci. With 10 loci and 10 alleles each only correct inferences were made over a wide range of the parameter space. Empirical data from microsatellite studies on several Asian Apis species will be presented to illustrate the application of the procedure.

 

Kraus FB, Neumann P, Scharpenberg H, van Praagh J, Moritz RFA,  Male fitness of honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera L.), Journal of Evolutionary Biology, in press.

 

A21

Population genetics and conservation of the Azorean bat (Nyctalus azoreum)

P Salgueiro(1), MM Coelho(1), J Palmeirim(1), Manuel Ruedi(2)

1 Dept of Zoology & Anthropology, University of Lisbon, Portugal

2 Natural History Museum of Geneva, Switzerland

The Azorean bat Nyctalus azoreum is the only endemic mammal native to the remote archipelago of the Azores. Because of its restricted and highly fragmented distribution, it is considered as a vulnerable species. To understand the evolutionary significance of the remaining populations of N. azoreum, we studied the genetic variability of 159 individuals from 21 breeding colonies sampled throughout the archipelago. Sequences of the mitochondrial D-loop region revealed moderate but highly structured genetic variability. Half of the 15 distinct haplotypes were restricted to a single island but the more common one was found all over the archipelago, suggesting a single colonisation event followed by limited inter-island female gene flow. All N. azoreum haplotypes were closely related and formed a star-like structure typical of populations that experienced demographic expansion. Indeed, the mismatch distribution of haplotypes within each island was compatible with such demographic models. Using a molecular calibration of D-loop evolution, the inferred age of demographic expansions is consistent with the unique arrival of founder animals during the Holocene, i.e. before the first humans settled in the Azores.

Comparisons with a reference population of N. leisleri from continental Portugal not only confirmed that all azoreum lineages are unique to the archipelago, but also that level of genetic diversity is high for an insular species. Because the current pattern of genetic diversity in N. azoreum is the result of a long history of isolation, and because females apparently move rarely among islands, local population extinctions may have dramatic effects on the global preservation of this species.

 

A22

Bayesian estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients from multi-locus genotypes

Pierre Berthier, Laurent Excoffier

University of Bern, Switzerland

Inbreeding is of major interest in conservation genetics, because its increase in small populations is believed to influence their probability of extinction. Many methods exist to estimate the average level of inbreeding in a population, based on samples of multi-locus genotypes.. However, it could be very useful to know the inbreeding coefficient of each individual in a sample, for example in studies of the correlation between genetic variability and fitness, or in captive breeding programs. Individual inbreeding levels are usually estimated from pedigree data, despite these data are notoriously difficult to obtain. The (often partial) genealogies of each individual allow one to estimate a ‘recent’ component of the inbreeding coefficient.  An other component, usually much more difficult to estimate, corresponds to the ‘ancestral’ (sometimes called ‘remote’) inbreeding level of the population. We propose here a new Bayesian method for jointly estimating both recent and remote components of inbreeding from a sample of multi-locus genotypes. We present a thorough evaluation of this method using simulations and compare its performance to available methods, which do not consider separately the two components of inbreeding.  We show that in realistic simulation scenarios our estimator has a much reduced associated mean square error.

 

A23

Gene flow in great bustard populations across the Straits of Gibraltar as elucidated from excremental PCR and mtDNA sequencing

Youssef Idaghdour, A Broderick, A Korrida, Hellmich

Genetics Department, IFCDW, Agadir, Morocco

Recent advances in molecular biology have made it possible to use the trace amounts of DNA in faeces to non-invasively sample endangered species for genetic studies.  Here we use faeces as a source of DNA and mtDNA sequence data to elucidate the relationship among Spanish and Moroccan populations of great bustards. 834bp of combined control region and cytochrome-b mtDNA fragments revealed four variable sites that defined seven closely related haplotypes in 54 individuals.  Morocco was fixed for a single mtDNA haplotype that occurs at moderate frequency (28%) in Spain.  We could not differentiate among the sampled Spanish populations of Cáceres and Andalucía but these combined populations were differentiated from the Moroccan

population.  Estimates of gene flow (Nm = 0.82) are consistent with extensive observations on the southern Iberian peninsular indicating that few individuals fly across the Straits of Gibraltar.  We demonstrate that both this sea barrier and mountain barriers in Spain limit dispersal among adjacent great bustard populations to a similar extent. The Moroccan population is of high ornithological significance as it holds the only population of great bustards in Africa.  This population is critically small and genetic and observational data indicate that it is unlikely to be recolonised via immigration from Spain should it be extirpated.  In light of the evidence presented here it deserves the maximum level of protection.

 

A24

Variable genetic response of two small mammals to late Holocene climatic change

Elizabeth A Hadly, Y Chan, M van Tuinen

Stanford University, USA

The influence of climatic change on genetic diversity is an unanswered question in conservation biology.  To investigate this question, we estimated haplotype diversity for two small mammals (Microtus montanus and Thomomys talpoides) over the last 3000 years using ancient DNA.  We tracked genetic diversity of these species using a 312-bp fragment of cytochrome b from fossils derived from a late-Holocene paleontological site, Lamar Cave, which is located in Yellowstone National Park, USA.  The late Holocene of Yellowstone witnessed warming and cooling events such as the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period.  Our data reveal that variation in species demography resulted in different consequences for genetic diversity during these times of climatic change, even with identical population size changes.  With decreasing population size due to environmental change, Thomomys talpoides has life history traits that resulted in genetic isolation, whereas Microtus montanus exhibited widespread gene flow.  Thus, life history traits such as dispersal ability contribute to the overall genetic diversity of species in both space and time.  Because population-size reduction in common species with different demographies will affect genetic structure in various ways, further investigation into the role of life-history on maintaining genetic diversity is imperative.  Ultimately, such knowledge will lead to distinct, and perhaps predictable, patterns of species persistence through future environmental change, an insight that may prove invaluable to future conservation of biodiversity.

 

A25

Effective population size estimation using approximate Bayesian methods with summary statistics.

David Tallmon(1), Mark Beaumont(2), Gordon Luikart(1)

Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France

University of Reading, UK

The effective size of a population (Ne) is a critical parameter to estimate in evolutionary and conservation studies.  Small Ne populations suffer from inbreeding effects and decreased ability to respond to selection, both of which can increase extinction risks.  Previous attempts to estimate Ne have focused on either genotypic information or allelic information.  Commonly used methods include gametic disequilibrium, heterozygote excess, the temporal method and M.  It is desirable to develop a method that combines both genotype and allele frequency information at multiple loci. We used a recently developed Bayesian approach to approximate the likelihood surface or posterior distribution for current and ancestral values of Ne. The method uses simple summary statistics from combined multilocus genotypic and allelic data taken from either one, or a number of temporally spaced samples to estimate known Ne and changes in Ne.  The advantages of the approach over previous methods are a) it includes the use of multilocus genotypic information in a likelihood-based framework, b) the method runs relatively rapidly on a computer in contrast to many other Bayesian methods.  We present results quantifying the performance of this method relative to existing ones.  This method  should help scientists and managers to assess efficiently and quickly the genetic and demographic risks faced by threatened populations.

 

A26

Out of equilibrium after recent habitat fragmentation: can population demographic changes be predicted from species-specific mobility?

Peter Galbusera(1), L Lens(2), J Huyghe(1), M Githiru(3,4), E Matthysen(1)

1 University of Antwerp, Belgium

2 Research Group Terrestrial Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

3 Department of Ornithology, National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya

4 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.

By comparing population equilibrium characteristics of five bird species inhabiting a recently fragmented landscape in Kenya, we examined how species-specific mobility affects population genetic responses to habitat fragmentation. We therefore analysed microsatellite data from samples collected in the same set of fragments. We checked the genetic structure of the populations, evidence for recent genetic and demographic bottlenecks and for changes in dispersal between subpopulations. Recent bottlenecks were detected by comparing the genetic diversity of a population to the heterozygosity expected under mutation-drift equilibrium. Changes in gene flow were found by comparing ‘historical‘ estimates based on Fst to current estimates based on mistnet (re)captures and genetic assignment tests. The genetic data on the current samples also allowed to distinguish between a (meta)population that is in migration-drift equilibrium versus a population that is under drift alone. Using museum samples, we confirmed a bottleneck in the smallest subpopulation of the Taita thrush, a local endemic with very low mobility. All three subpopulations of the Yellow-throated woodland warbler, a more widely spread species, showed evidence of a bottleneck and of a significant decrease in current versus historic levels of dispersal. In contrast, three other species with relatively high mobility showed no or limited genetic structure and no evidence for recent changes in population genetic parameters. Hence, species with a relatively high or low mobility were relatively unaffected, whereas the warbler, which has an intermediate mobility, was most affected. This suggests that the effect of habitat isolation depends on species mobility in a non-linear fashion.

 

A27

Bayesian and coalescence analyses reveal extreme different genetic trajectories and structures in two neotropical superpredators: the cases of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) and of the jaguar (Panthera onca).

Manuel Ruiz-Garcia, P Orozco-Terwengel

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.

In the Andean highlands, the spectacled bear is the highest predator.  At the neotropical rain forest the jaguar is the most important predator.  In the first species, we analyzed 9 microsatellites, whereas in the second 18 microsatellites were studied.  Although, both organisms are superpredators, their coalescence gene trajectories are extremely opposed. Results were as follows: 1- The number of alleles per locus and the heterozygosity was almost two-folds in the jaguar. 2-  The genetic heterogeneity between spectacled bear and jaguars populations was extremely different.  The first showed values of Fst ranging from 0.127 to 0.262, meanwhile these values were 0.01 to 0.02 in the jaguar. 3- The gene flow estimates agree quite well with this picture.  The values for the Andean bear were noteworthy small indicating isolation between the populations of this species (Nm = 0.273-1.170).  Otherwise for the jaguar, these values oscillated from 3.09 to 12.13. 4-  The analysis of the cryptic structure revealed that in the spectacled bear different gene pools were detected across the countries and only a very limited number of hybrids between these pools were detected.  Contrarily, for the jaguar only two different gene pools were detected in an area were 6 different jaguar subspecies had been defined. Individuals of both gene pools were found together in a same locality. 5- The historical effective numbers were calculated for both species (Nielsen, 1997).  The estimates for jaguars were higher than those obtained for the spectacled bear (15.000-18.000 individuals versus 2430 individuals, respectively). 6- The Beaumont’s procedure to detect population expansion and decline was employed. The bears offered constant small effective numbers with a slight trend to decline in a 10-20%, whereas jaguars yielded higher effective numbers with evidence to increase in a 18-30% regard to the original populations.   

 

A28

A critical examination of network methods and rooting procedures

I. Cassens and M.C. Milinkovitch

Unit of Evolutionary Genetics, Institute of Molecular Biology and Medicine, Free University of Brussels, rue Jeener & Brachet 12, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium; www.ulb.ac.be/sciences/ueg

We investigated the phylogeography and evolutionary history of dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) using DNA sequences of the full mitochondrial cytochrome b gene in 124 individuals from the putative stocks off Peru, Argentina, and Southwest Africa. We analysed our mitochondrial sequence data with several widely-used network estimation and rooting methods. The resulting intraspecific gene genealogies and rooting inferences exhibited substantial differences, underlying limitations of some algorithms. Given that scientific hypotheses and management decisions strongly depend on inferred tree or network topologies, there is a clear need for a systematic comparative analysis of available methods

 

A29

Associations between individual genetic diversity and fitness related traits in endangered salmon and trout populations

Craig R. Primmer1, Katriina Tiira1 and Jorma Piironen2.

1 Dept. of Ecology and Systematics, P.O. Box 65, 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland

2 Finnish Game And Fisheries Research Institute, Finland.

Although a positive correlation between genetic diversity (GD), as estimated by molecular markers, and fitness related traits has been observed in a number of studies, this association is not universal. Hence, it remains controversial if, or when, molecular marker variability can be used as a surrogate measure for fitness. Another criticism of this line of research is the fact that many studies addressing this issue have been conducted in the captive environment, and hence their relevance to the conservation of wild populations is unclear. Nevertheless, the captive environment does offer some advantages for investigation of specific fitness related traits that would be difficult or impossible to study in the wild. In this seminar, I will present results from two studies on hatchery reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (S. trutta) which approach the analysis of GD-fitness related trait associations from alternative angles. In one study, experimental groups of salmon fry harbouring unusually high or low levels of genetic variation were created, and it was then examined whether a behavioural trait important for fitness (aggression) differed between the groups. In a second study, salmon and trout stocks were partitioned into groups with either extremely low fitness (presence of a severe morphological deformity) or assumedly normal fitness (no obvious deformities) and then the levels of genetic variation in the two groups were compared. The results from both studies suggest that low levels of genetic variation may negatively affect the fitness of individuals in these populations, most likely due to inbreeding depression.

 

A30

Challenges in assessing genetic biodiversity: an empirical illustration through recent research on salmonid fishes.

Louis Bernatchez

Laval University, Québec, Canada

Conservation geneticists are still facing many challenges in terms of assessing genetic biodiversity and inferring its relevance for management of natural populations. First, we still have to agree on the most appropriate method to delineate relevant patterns of population structuring for conservation purposes. In particular, the weak correlation that has been reported between diversity at neutral markers and that at quantitative traits has raised concerns regarding the usefulness of neutral markers for conservation. This also stressed the need for documenting genetic structure at genes that can be more informative in terms of adaptation. While this can be accomplished by various methods, conceptual and practical limitations are still restraining our ability to routinely apply them in most contexts. A second and related important aspect that has been debated concerns the geographic scale of genetic structuring that should be considered for management. This is not an easy issue since most species are genetically structured in a hierarchical manner, implying various levels of connectivity through gene flow. Thirdly, given the accelerating pace of demographic and environmental changes to which organisms are exposed, it is also becoming urgent for bioconservation to elucidate the evolutionary processes responsible for shaping adaptative genetic diversity. Using recent empirical studies on salmonid fishes, I will illustrate how conservation efforts can be better deserved by; i) integrating both neutral and potentially selected traits in studies of population structure and ii) considering the significance of population structuring at various geographic scales. Finally, I will show how recent empirical research on salmonid fishes is also contributing to the understanding of processes that may be driving the maintenance of adaptive genetic diversity. 

 

A31

Relationships between genetic variation and phenotypic 'success': is more variation better?

Kathryn M Rodríguez-Clark

Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research, Caracas, Venezuela

Despite long-standing interest in the area, controversy still surrounds the causal relationships between molecular genetic variation and phenotype-based measures of 'success.' While part of this disagreement may come from truly open scientific questions, part may also arise from a confusion of the different levels of organization at which genetic variation and phenotypic 'success' may be conceptualized (individual vs. population), and from mistakenly comparing the results of single-timepoint with longitudinal studies. Single-timepoint studies generally fail to demonstrate strong relationships between either standing heterozygosity and fitness/developmental stability (as individual-level measures), or between standing gene diversity and additive genetic variance (population-level ones). This may be due both to the equilibrium assumptions which lead to the expectation of a relationship in a cross-section of individuals or populations, as well as to inherent estimation error. In contrast, longitudinal studies in both captivity and in nature routinely reveal a decline in fitness or its correlates with a decline in heterozygosity, a clear threat to short-term persistence on the individual level. Mechanisms underlying this inbreeding depression remain unclear, however, such that the conservation applications of these observations remain ad hoc. Recent results from longitudinal experiments in captivity furthermore confirm the expected decline in adaptive potential with declines in gene diversity, on the population level. However, the sampling variance in this process appears to be large, such that the threat this process poses to the long-term conservation of any single population may be less important than other factors.

 

A32

Population, conservation genetics and management of game species

Ettore Randi

Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica (INFS), Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy

Conservationists would agree that the main scopes of conservation genetics are the identification of evolutionary significant units (through the use of “neutral” molecular markers), and the preservation of heterozygosity and genetic diversity at functional gene system, which should allow the processes of natural selection and adaptation to continue in the future. Hunting activities have, directly or indirectly, strongly affected the dynamics of game species during the last thousands of years. Probably the first anthropogenic extinctions were the results of hunting (the prehistoric overkill of large mammals at the end of the Pleistocene, and the many mass extinctions in oceanic islands). Direct persecution of “predators” lead to widespread eradication and fragmentation of many carnivore populations for centuries in the past in Europe. Hunting for food was a main threat to ungulate populations in the European countries until the end of WW II, and currently it is an increasing threat to wildlife in Tropical countries (bushmeat and wildlife trade). Sport hunting is still affecting the population and, probably, the evolutionary dynamics of important groups of terrestrial vertebrates (carnivores, ungulates, galliforms, waterfowl and migratory birds). Disturbance to wild-living hunting species is partially due to direct hunting activities (the consequences of over-hunting or selective hunting), but it is mainly due to bad management practices (restocking of natural populations using captive-propagated animals, translocations of animals outside their natural biogeographic areas). The main genetic consequences of hunting practices are: the destabilization of demographic structure (with alteration of mating patterns and effective population size), increasing population fragmentation (with alteration of the patterns of gene flow), inflation of demographic fluctuations (with alteration of the rate of genetic drift), translocations (with hybridization and admixture of populations from distinct biogeographic units), restocking with captive animals (with alteration of population genetic and epidemiologic equilibria). Thus, disturbance due to hunting activities can make even more difficult the identification and preservation of evolutionary significant units and population heterozygosity in game species. However, hunting activities generate important flows of human and financial resources dedicated to wildlife management. Conservationists should, therefore, consider game species as flagship species, and interact with hunters and hunting managers to improve the management of hunting species and areas.

 

A33

To be announced

Gordon Luikart

University of Grenoble, France

 

A34

Trends in conservation genetics: changes and advances in molecular marker applications.

Phillip A. Morin

Molecular Ecology Laboratory, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Conservation genetics is a field that has grown out of the development of new molecular methods and genetic markers, and their application to studies from the individual to the species level. The choice of markers to address questions at each level is limited, but our genetic toolbox is expanding with new molecular and analytical methods.  As we have applied existing tools, such as mitochondrial DNA sequencing and microsatellite genotyping, we have learned of their inherent limitations, and overcome some initial hurdles. As we enter the ‘genomic age’ of biology, there are new methods and genetic markers that can be applied to existing questions. One new and very promising tool is the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), the most abundant polymorphic genetic marker in most genomes. SNPs hold the potential to significantly expand our ability to survey neutral variation as well as genes under selection in natural populations. The choice of genetic markers to apply to specific questions is still complex, however, and improvement in methods and applications with both existing and new markers will be needed to further expand our ability to effectively apply genetics for conservation.

 

A35

Male and female dispersal behaviour, and the population genetics of marine

mammal species.

A Rus Hoelzel, A Natoli, A Fabiani

University of Durham, UK

Marine mammals have the capacity to travel great distances in the marine environment (as shown from satellite tracking and tag recovery data), which suggests the potential for panmixia over large geographic ranges. The fact that we often see just the opposite - fine-scale population structure, indicates that there are other factors determining dispersal behaviour. As for mammal species in general, there could also be differential strategies for males and females (where males are typically the greater dispersers), though these have been difficult to demonstrate. In this talk I will review studies conducted in my lab that provide some insight into this question, and address some of the possible factors important in the evolution of population structure in these species.  The focus will be on three species, the killer whale (Orcinus orca), the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina).  Killer whales show unusual fidelity to matrifocal social groups over the lifetime of the individual, and the population structure reflects this.  Both killer whales and bottlenose dolphins show evidence for philopatry for both males and females, unlike several other well-studies cetacean species. In contrast, male and female southern elephant seals show distinct strategies. Molecular data (primarily mtDNA and microsatellite DNA) for all three species will be presented and compared to show how different strategies have led to different population structure and patterns of evolution, and this will be discussed in the context of biodiversity conservation.

 

A36

The use of network tree approaches for phylogeography and conservation

Walter Salzburger, A Meyer

University of Konstanz, Germany

Network tree approaches based on DNA sequence data can contribute to resolving population-genetic questions. For phylogeographic and conservation biological inference mitochondrial DNA sequences are commonly used because of their faster rate of molecular evolution, the experimental ease due to universal primers, the lack of recombination, and the maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA. However, there are several concerns about the application of haplotype network trees based on mitochondrial DNA markers, such as the occurrence of homoplasious mutations in larger data sets, including distantly related taxa. Here, we present a network tree-building approach combining the maximum parsimony and the maximum likelihood method. We also outline guidelines for the depiction of network trees including the evaluation of homoplasy. Two data sets based on the mitochondrial control region with conservation biology relevance are presented as examples, a recently published survey of the cichlid species flock of Lake Victoria, East Africa,1 and a phylogeographic analysis of the endangered cyprinid species Leuciscus souffia from the Alps and surrounding regions2.

1Verheyen E, Salzburger W, Snoeks J & A Meyer, Science 300: 325-329

2Salzburger W, Brandstätter A, Gilles A, Parson W, Sturmbauer C & A Meyer, Molecular Ecology (in press)

 

A37

Temporal population genetics in a red fox population following a rabies epidemic

Peter Wandeler(1,2), U Breitenmoser(3), Mike W Bruford(2), SM Funk(1)

1 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, BEPG, University of Cardiff, UK

3 Swiss Rabies Centre, Institute of Veterinary Virology, University of Bern, Switzerland

There are few long-time studies on the dynamics of natural populations and even more rare are studies describing the genetic and demographic structure of populations over a period of several generations. The aim of this study is to describe the genetic variation within a local red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population following the rabies epidemics in Switzerland from 1967-96 and to identify processes of population genetic dynamics and epidemics. A total of sixteen polymorphic dog and red fox specific microsatellite loci were successfully amplified in 184 historic teeth and tissue samples, which were continuously sampled in an area of 410km2 from 1969 onwards, representing twelve to fifteen fox generations. To account for erroneous results by microsatellite amplification from highly diluted DNA, the nuclear DNA concentration for all historic samples was initial estimated using a quantitative PCR approach. Based on these findings potential homozygote genotypes were repeatedly re-amplified. The genetic data were complemented by individual age and long-term demographic data, which were based on local roadkill statistics. Preliminary analyses indicate no apparent genetic bottleneck, although the red fox density declined more than 85% following the first wave of the rabies epidemic, but a possible change of fox migration patterns. The general importance of these findings within a broader conservation context will be discussed.

 

A38

Non-invasive determination of genetic diversity and paternity analysis of African elephant (Loxodonta africana) using genomic DNA micrisatellite markers

Deusdedith RS Ishengoma(1), BM Mutayoba(2), CAH Foley (3), A Shadlock(4), SK Wasser(4).

1 National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga, Tanzania

2 Department of Veterinary Physiology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Toxicoloy. Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O Box 3017, Morogoro, Tanzania.

3 Tarangire Elephant Project, P.O Box 2703,  Arusha, Tanzania.

4 Centre for Conservation Biology, Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

We used faecal-derived nuclear DNA to examine the genetic diversity and paternity of African elephants from a severely poached elephant population in Tarangire National Park (TNP), in Tanzania. We assessed how poaching affects male variance in reproductive success. The results obtained using eight polymorphic microsallite markers showed that the amplification and genotyping success per locus ranged from 81.4 to 91.9% (n=86). All microsatellite markers were polymorphic with a total of 60 alleles and the mean number of alleles per locus was 7.50. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 3 to 11 while the mean polymorphic information content (PIC) was 66%. The expected heterozygosity per locus ranged from 53.8 to 82.0% with a mean of 70.6% for all loci. Test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was not significant at all loci. The genotype data enabled assignment of 38% and 83% of offspring (n=29) at 80% confidence level to their potential fathers with simulations assuming that 30% (12/40) and 100% (12/12) of the breeding males were sampled. Further assessment of mating success among sampled bulls revealed that 7.5% of all potential breeding bulls were responsible for fathering 31.0% and 52% of all 29 offspring, assuming 30% and 100% sampling of breeding bulls respectively. We conclude that elephants in TNP have high genetic diversity despite high poaching pressure that occurred between 1979 and late 1980s and males’ reproductive success in the sampled elephant population seem to be biased towards dominant bulls.

 

A39

From isolation to connectivity - conservation genetics of capercaillie

Gernot Segelbacher

Max Planck Research Centre for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Germany

Capercaillie is closely associated with older stages of coniferous forests and is considered an important umbrella species for boreal and montane forest biodiversity conservation. I will outline the use of microsatellite markers to study consequences of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and demonstrate a non-invasive genetic approach using moulted feathers. I document the genetic differentiation of capercaillie populations at different fragmentation stages along a gradient of spatial structuring from high connectivity (continuous range in the boreal forest) to metapopulation systems (Alps) and recent (central Europe) and historic (Pyrenees) isolation. Analysing 460 individuals from 14 sample sites at 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci assessed genetic structure and variation of capercaillie populations across the European range. Results agree with the concept of a gradual increase of genetic differentiation from connectivity to isolation, and from recent to historic isolation. Anthropogenic habitat fragmentation may have significant population genetic and thus, evolutionary consequences.

 

A40

Two hundred years in the history of Scandinavian wolves: decline and recovery

Carles Vilŕ, Ř Flagstad, A-K Sundqvist, J Seddon, H Ellegren

Uppsala University, Sweden

The Scandinavian wolf (Canis lupus) population suffered a dramatic decline during the XIXth century and was considered functionally extinct during the decade of 1960. However, a new breeding pack was established in 1983 in southern Sweden, more than 900 km away from the limit of the distribution of wolves in Finland and Russia. Since 1983 the wolf population has been increasing and now numbers more than 100 individuals. A harsh debate arose about the origin of the founders of this population. Using mitochondrial, autosomal and Y chromosome markers we have been able to reconstruct the history of the population and we concluded that it was founded by just two individuals immigrating from the neighbouring wolf population in Finland and Russia. The analyses also showed that one additional male arrived in the early 1990s and allowed a marked population growth. However, although these results imply some degree of communication between the different wolf populations, the study of museum specimens from the XIX and XXth century imply that Scandinavian wolves may have traditionally been isolated and that immigration has always been an exceptional event. The low genetic diversity in the extant Scandinavian wolf population and the elevated risk for inbreeding depression –as seen in captive Swedish wolves- implies that the maintenance of occasional gene flow may be important for the long-term survival of the population.

 

A41

Genetic diversity within and among Turkish sheep breeds, their domestication histories and conservation

Evren Koban(1), E Özkan(2), V Altunok(3), M Nizamlıoğlu(3), İ Soysal(2), Mike W Bruford(4), İ Togan(1)

1 Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

2 Faculty of Agriculture, Trakya University, Tekirdag, Turkey

3 Dept Vet Internal Med, Fac Vet Med, Selcuk Univ, 42031 Konya, Turkey

4 Cardiff University, UK

Domestication of sheep appears to have taken place in the Near East approximately 9000 BP. Recent molecular genetic data have shown that modern domestic sheep (Ovis aries L.) has descended from the Asiatic mouflon (Ovis gmelini) which is found in Turkey and Iran. Then domestic sheep spread throughout the world along with humans and agricultural practices. Currently there are over one billion sheep and more than 1400 recognised breeds adapted to different geographic regions and different environmental conditions. However, in the last few decades there is an important reduction in the number of breeds. For example, the 22.5% of the European breeds has become extinct mainly in the process of selection in economically important breeds. With every breed that becomes extinct, some genetic diversity is lost, too. Moreover some important genetic characteristics, such as disease resistance, may also be lost.

Molecular genetic analyses (eg. mtDNA, microsatelite DNA studies) have enabled us to study the genetic resources, origins and evolution of livestock species. The detailed genetic study of the breeds has a prime importance to find out the conservation priority of the breed(s) and population(s).

The aims of this study were (i) to measure the genetic diversity within and among Turkish sheep breeds using 10 polymorphic microsatellites and to compare the results with that of other sheep breeds from Europe, Asia and Africa; (ii) to identify their domestication ancestory by mtDNA control region RFLP and sequencing analysis to address questions about the evolution of domestic sheep breeds; (iii) to develop conservation strategies.

 

A42

Genetic diversity, reproduction and population viability in Lusitanian sea stars.

Erika Baus, D Darrock, Mike W Bruford

Cardiff University, UK

Two species of sea stars, Asterina gibbosa and Asterina phylactica, occur along the West coast of Europe, ranging from Scotland to the Adriatic sea. Although congeners and morphologically similar, these two species differ markedly in their life history strategies and habitat specificity. The first aim of this project is to study the impact of the distinct reproduction and dispersal modes of these two species on their population structure across their geographical range. It is anticipated that these data will help reveal the process which shapes genetic diversity within and amongst populations of littoral invertebrates. The second aim of this project is to assess the demographic and genetic consequences of a recent human-mediated environmental disaster (the Sea Empress oil spill, 1996) that led to the quasi-extinction of A. phylactica at this site. By examining the changes in the genetic diversity that occurred in both species as a result of this oil spill (using field data collected before, during and after the disaster), we hope to improve our limited understanding of natural population bottlenecks. Genetic variation will be measured at nuclear loci using microsatellite markers, which are currently being isolated for each species, and will be analysed using genealogical and Bayesian approaches. In conclusion, the features of this project is that it will follow the genetic consequences of a population bottleneck in real-time and that it will use for the first time microsatellite markers to assess population structure and dynamics in sea stars. Direct conservation benefits are also expected from this study.

 

A43

Two African origins and extremely weak population structure in donkeys revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequencing

Albano Beja-Pereira(1,2), N Ferrand(1,3) O Ertugrul(4), L Ouragh(5), Gordon Luikart(2)

1 University of Porto, Vairăo, Portugal

2 Jouseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France

3 Department of Zoology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

4 Veterinary Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

5 Département de Pathologie Médicale et Chirurgicale des Equidés & Carnivores, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Maroc

The domestic donkey is considered the most threatened domestic species in Europe. Although, the origins of donkey domestication are far from being clear, several archaeological data indicates the African wild ass (Equus africanus) as the potential source. However, like the domestic the wild relative are severely threatened.  Here we examine mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control-region sequence variation of 232 domestic donkeys covering 52 countries across the old world continents.  We found that all sequences cluster within two main groups, indicating two different maternal origins. MtDNA sequences of 6 individuals representative of the two subspecies of the wild African ass (E. a. somaliensis and E. a. africanus) grouped with each one of the two domestic lineages.  An absence of phylogeographic structure, but similar gene diversity across continents supports high movements over long distances. However, North East Africa region retain more mutation-sites and subsequently more unique mtDNA haplotypes when compared with the other hypothetical places of domestication, and thus, let us to support Northeaster Africa as the unique center of domestication of the donkey.

 

A44

Mixed stock analysis using Bayesian methods: a green turtle feeding ground in the Gulf of Guinea.

Angela Formia, Mike W Bruford

Cardiff University, UK

Mixed stock analysis (MSA) has traditionally relied on maximum likelihood estimation and bootstrapping, to calculate the highest likelihood of observing the sampled composition of a mixed stock given set parameters.  However, such methods assume that all potentially contributing populations are fully described, and are subject to error with small sample sizes, rare haplotypes or uneven true stock proportions.  A new approach to MSA has recently been developed based on Bayesian statistics, which addresses the shortcomings of maximum likelihood methods.  It is based on the assumption that the proportion parameters are random variables assigned prior and posterior probability distributions, the data being used to update information about the parameters through Monte Carlo Markov Chains.  Thus, the prior probability is accepted as uncertain or uninformative (flat prior), while successive iterations converge on the desired posterior distribution.  We applied Bayesian MSA to an endangered green turtle (Chelonia mydas) population sampled in the Corisco Bay feeding ground (Equatorial Guinea and Gabon).  We sequenced 489 bases of the mitochondrial DNA control region in 239 individuals, and found that ten rookeries in the Atlantic and Indian oceans were potentially contributing to this mixed stock, with Ascension Island as the major contributor.  Bayesian MSA adequately overcame potential weaknesses, including the presence of one very common and several rare haplotypes, the lack of fully-described potential contributors, overlapping haplotype frequencies among rookeries, and the possibility of sampling error.  Although confidence intervals were wide, simulations showed the analysis to be sufficiently robust to make conservation recommendations for this population.

 

A45

Population genetic structure of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) in Bavaria, southern Germany: implications for conservation

Bernhard Gum(1), R Gross(2), O Rottmann(3), W Schroeder(1), R Kuehn(1)

1 Technical University Munich-Weihenstephan, Freising, Germany

2 Institute of Animal Science, Estonian Agricultural University, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia

3 Department for Animal Sciences, Technical University Munich-Weihenstephan, D-85354 Freising, Germany

European grayling populations in Bavaria have shown steady declines during the last 10-20 years. In order to provide guidelines for conservation strategies and future management programs, we investigated the genetic structure of 15 grayling populations originating from three major Central European drainages (the Danube, the Elbe and the Rhine/Main) using 20 microsatellite loci. Genetic divergence between the three drainage systems was substantial as illustrated by highly significant heterogeneity of genotype frequencies, high number of drainage-specific private alleles, high between-drainage FST values, high assignment success of individuals to their drainage of origin and the high bootstrap support for the genetic distance based drainage-specific population clusters. In agreement with earlier studies, microsatellites revealed relatively low levels of intrapopulation genetic diversity (as measured by allelic richness (AR) and heterozygosity (HE) estimates) in comparison to the overall level of variation across populations. Maximum likelihood methods using the coalescent approach revealed that the proportion of common ancestors (as inferred from the F values of the 2MOD program) was generally high in native populations and that the estimates of Ne (as estimated by the parameter θ of the MIGRATE program) were correlated with the genetic diversity parameters AR and HE in all drainages. The number of effective immigrants per generation (Nem) was less than one for all pairwise comparisons of populations within the drainages, indicating efficient interpopulation reproductive isolation either as a result of limited dispersal behaviour or physical barriers to the migration. Based on these findings we recommend a drainage and sub-drainage specific conservation of grayling populations in order to preserve their overall genetic diversity and integrity. For large-scale stocking actions to supplement the declining or to restore the extinct  populations, creation of separate broodstocks for major conservation units (ESUs and MUs) is warranted.

 

A46

Natural hybridization and introgression of Triturus cristatus genetic traits into Triturus carnifex in the northern part of its range.

Peter Mikulíček(1,2), J Piálek(1)

1 Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Studenec, Czech Republic

2 Department of Zoology, Biodiversity Research Group, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic

Hybridization and introgression can contribute to the extinction of rare populations and species that come into contact with more abundant or introduced species. However, natural hybridization is also recognized as playing an important role in the evolution of many animal and plant taxa. The crested newt taxa (Triturus cristatus superspecies) represent a group of  closely related species with parapatric distributions. They co-occur and likely interbreed wherever their distribution ranges meet. It has been established that interspecific hybridization close to or in the contact zones leads to introgression of mitochondrial and nuclear genes among species. Recently, occurrence of the Italian crested newt (T. carnifex) was demonstrated in the Czech Republic using allozyme and morphological data. This species is distributed from the Apennine Peninsula and the Adriatic part of the Balkans to the central Europe and populations from the southern Czech Republic represent its most northerly distribution. We have analyzed these populations using species-specific RAPD markers in order to find out the rate of hybridization and introgression between T. carnifex and northerly and widely distributed T. cristatus. We have documented introgression of T. cristatus genetic traits into T. carnifex populations as a result of interspecific hybridization. Because populations are fragmented, likely to habitat modifications, it was not possible to delimit any hybrid zones between these species.

 

A47

Conservation genetics of the red squirrel, Scirius vulgaris, in a refugial population on Anglesey, North Wales.

Rob Ogden(1),  R McEwing(1),  C Shuttleworth(2)

(1) University of Wales, Bangor, UK

(2) Red Squirrel Project Manager, Mentor Mon, Bryn Cefni Industrial Park, Llangefni, Isle of Anglesey, LL77 7XA, UK

The Eurasian red squirrel (Scirius vulgaris) has become increasingly threatened in the United Kingdom as a result of habitat degradation, non-indigenous grey squirrel, (S. americanus) introductions, and more recently the parapox virus. Mainland populations of the red squirrel have been lost throughout most of its range in England and Wales and within Scotland, its last stronghold, grey squirrel numbers are increasing. Recently, work has begun aimed at conserving the last ‘healthy’ population in Wales, located on the island of Anglesey. This population is currently free of parapox and numbers have steadily increased from around 50 to 85 during the last five years in response to a contentious grey squirrel culling program. Despite this increase, there is concern that a reduction in effective population size following the protracted bottleneck of the Anglesey population, may threaten the long-term viability and future recovery of this important remnant group. To assess levels of genetic diversity we conducted a survey of mitochondrial and nuclear variability within the Anglesey population.  In common with several other UK populations, the Anglesey population was found to be monomorphic for a unique mtDNA control region haplotype (n=47). Results for six highly variable microsatellite loci (n=47) revealed a pronounced lack of allelic variability when compared with data for other UK populations. This result suggests that augmentation of the Anglesey population may be appropriate. Increasing genetic variation within this population could ensure its future and make it a suitable stock for subsequent re-introductions in other areas as local habitat is restored.

 

A48

Individual identification of brown bear (Ursus arctos) from central Italy using non-invasive genetic sampling.

Massimo Pierpaoli(1), A Putrella(2), L Sammarone(2), M Posillico(2,3), Ettore Randi(1)

1 Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica (INFS), Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy

2 Ufficio Amministrazione Foreste Demaniali di Castel di Sangro, Castel di Sangro (AQ).

3 Department of Environmental Sciences, Behavioural Ecology, Behaviour and Wildlife Management Section, University of Siena, Siena.

The European populations of brown bear (Ursus arctos) are listed in the lower risk category in the IUCN red list of endangered species, and under the Appendix II of CITES. The brown bear population in central Italy, which is fully protected by national regulations, is mostly located in the Abruzzo National Park and its surroundings. The size and current demographic trend of this population are unknown. Data on genetic variability and population structure are also missing. Within a conservation project of the Apennine brown bear population, we developed non-invasive genetic methods aimed to: (1) setting up a system of markers able to identify single genotypes, 2) discriminating the sex of the samples, 3) assessing the average level of variability at a panel of nuclear loci. DNA was extracted from hairs and faeces collected from June 2000 to November 2002 in various locations east and north of the Abruzzo National Park. Barbed wire traps were used to collect hairs, while faeces have been collected along a fixed trails system. A multiple tube approach was applied to obtain reliable genotyping. Mitochondrial DNA sequencing was used for species discrimination on hair samples, nine microsatellite loci were screened to identify individual genotypes and the sex-linked gene amelogenin was used for molecular sexing.

 

A49

When, why and how to use the Structure software: a simulation study

Sébastien Regnaut, G Evanno, J Goudet

University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Inferring population genetic structure is usually achieved using genetic distances or fixation indexes such as Fst. This approach implies the a priori definition of a set of populations, i.e. on geographic criteria. A more objective method to detect sub-structuring is the Bayesian clustering approach implemented in the software Structure (Pritchard et al., 2000). From a whole genetic data set Structure identifies sub-populations and assigns individuals (probabilistically) to these populations. But the ability of this program to detect different types of population structure has not yet been thoroughly tested. In various simulated situations, we have analysed the sensitivity of Structure to the type of genetic markers (AFLP vs. microsatellite), the number of loci scored, the number of populations sampled, and the number of individuals typed in each sample.

 

A50

Genetic structure of the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) metapopulation in western Switzerland

S Dubey, Sylvain Ursenbacher, J Pellet, L Fumagalli

University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Nowadays, the survival of threatened species as the green tree frog (Hyla arborea) is strongly dependent on the genetic variability within the populations, as well as gene flow between populations. In Switzerland, the distribution of this species has strongly regressed during the last century, although three sectors still have metapopulations in the canton of Vaud: the lemanic Coast, the Grangettes, and the southern shore of the Neuchâtel Lake, the latter being one of the largest of Switzerland. In this study, 7 microsatellites loci were used to establish the levels of structuring of the populations of the Coast and Southern shore, including their consanguinity level, in order to suggest a plan of management. The results of this work show that the populations have: 1) a relatively high allelic richness, 2) a weak structuring (Fst by metapopulation = 0.04), 3) a Fis similar with other species of batrachians. No isolation by distance is detected on the intra-metapopulational level. These results show a strong mobility of the green tree frog in highly variable environments such as reed bed, wooded cords, and cultures. This encourages the digging of new ponds, which will quickly be colonized by the tree frogs, with an object of increasing metapopulation size on the Coast, as well as connecting the 2 studied metapopulations.

 

A51

Conservation genetic of the Viperine Snake (Natrix maura, Colubridae) in its northeastern distribution area

M Nembrini, S Regnaut, Sylvain Ursenbacher, L Fumagalli

University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Detailed attention for the conservation of endangered species is granted to maintain genetic variation within populations, particularly when they become isolated and reduced in size. The Viperine snake (Natrix maura) is the most threatened reptile in Switzerland, where it is found only in three residual populations. In this study, 6 microsatellite loci were used to generate information on the degree and distribution of genetic variation, and on the level of inbreeding within populations, in order to understand how evolutionary processes operate in these populations and to aid the development of conservation plans for this species. The results of this work show that these populations are characterised by. I) a strong structuring and genetic isolation (Fst = 0.13-0.35), ii) a poor allelic diversity, iii) a strong excess of homozygotes (Fis = 0.2). This suggests that Swiss populations have undergone changes in allelic frequencies, due to genetic drift and to absence of genetic flow among the three populations. The combination of these factors seems to reflect the residual and unstable state of Viperine snake populations in Switzerland. These populations should be carefully monitored as much from a demographic point of view (currently in progress) as from genetic one. Translocations of individuals between these three remnant populations should be considered, in order to restore levels of genetic variation higher than those presently observed.

 

A52

Genetic discrimination between wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the world’s most productive Atlantic salmon river system.

Juha-Pekka Vähä(1), J Erkinaro(2), Craig R Primmer(1)

1 University of Helsinki, Finland

2 Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Oulu, Finland

The basis of genetic differentiation and thus local adaptation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations lies in its well documented homing behaviour. Local adaptation of salmonid populations can be observed in some ethological, physiological and morphological traits, which are shown to be genetically controlled. Loss of local adaptation and break-up of favourable epistatic interactions can result in outbreeding depression. Furthermore, such a loss of genetic uniqueness can be regarded as a form of extinction. In March 2003, a cage containing over 100000 adult salmon was torn in a storm outside the mouth of one of the world’s largest Atlantic salmon rivers, the river Teno. Teno runs between Norway and Finland to the Arctic Ocean. Teno’s annual catch of wild salmon is around 150 tons of which about a quarter is caught by recreational fishermen. In other similar escape events, escapees have been reported to comprise up to 70% of mature adults in some rivers. Although the breeding success of escapees and their genetic impact on wild population have been subject to considerable speculation, this escape event has the potential to have a significant negative effect on the Teno salmon population. Application of individual assignment tests in the field of fisheries has been particularly widespread due to the importance of accurate population assignment for a variety of purposes including distinction between individuals of native and stocked origin. We present preliminary results on the use individual assignment tests to genetically discriminate between farmed and wild Teno salmon using microsatellite data.

 

A53

Identifying native brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) by means of RAPD and mitochondrial DNA

Jeroen Van Houdt (1), J Pinceel (1), M-C Flamand (2), M Briquet (2), E Dupont (3), FAM Volckaert (1), PV Baret (2)

1 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Ch. de Bériotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

2 Université Catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre , Croix-du-Sud 2 box 14, B-1348, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium

3 Ministčre de la Région Wallonne, Centre de Recherch de la Nature, des Fôrets et du Bois, B- Marloie, Belgium

The effects of migration barriers and stocking of hatchery brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) into wild populations was studied in the catchments of the Belgian rivers Scheldt and Meuse. Samples from 12 wild populations (n = 309) and 7 hatchery stocks (n = 200) were analysed at the mitochondrial control region with SSCP and at 27 RAPD loci. The hatchery samples were nearly undifferentiated and could be considered as a homogeneous group, reflecting the extensive stock transfer between hatcheries. Assignment analysis revealed a substantial degree of introgression of hatchery material into the downstream populations. Nevertheless, the impact was less than expected considering the intensive stocking of the last decades. In the upstream parts of the rivers migration barriers often isolated the present natural populations. Although these populations became often genetically impoverished because of their isolated situation, almost all appeared to be unaffected by hatchery material.  All the indigenous populations likely represent a fraction of the ancestral gene pool and might be valuable to restore the pre-stocking conditions. An inventory of migration barriers is currently made in order to remove them and guarantee upstream and downstream movement of freshwater species. Although these measures are taken in order to enhance the freshwater fauna, they might be destructive for the vulnerable indigenous brow trout gene pools. We suggest to restock the downstream parts of rivers with material from the indigenous upstream populations before the removal of barriers, in order to restore a diverse and natural gene pool.

 

A54

Genetic diversity and population structure of Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus, from Trentino (Italy).

Andrea Gandolfi (1), J Battilana (1), F Ciutti (1), P Ajmone-Marsan (2), MS Grando (1)

1 Research Centre, Ist. Agrario di S.Michele a/Adige, Via E. Mach 1, 38010 S.Michele a/Adige (TN), Italy

2 Institute of Zootechnics, Catholic University of S. Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29100 Piacenza, Italy

The Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus, has a wide geographic distribution in Europe, reaching the South of the European Alps, in Italy. Populations are characterised by high levels of morphological and life history traits variation, and fine-scale genetic population structure has been recently demonstrated by the use of molecular markers (SSRs). In Italy, the Arctic char is at present considered to be naturally occurring only in Trentino, where populations with different levels of natural and historical isolation and anthropic impact are thought to be originated as a relict from the last glaciation. These Italian populations, that represent the southern limit of the species areal, and considered to be endangered by the IUCN Red List, have never been included in previous genetic studies. We present preliminary data obtained using SSR and AFLP markers to characterise individuals sampled from nine lakes in Trentino, compared with data on populations from North of Europe and Northern Alps. These data will contribute 1) to assess  the  genetic variability and the population structure of Arctic char in Italy; 2) to evaluate the populations nativeness and uniqueness and to test and validate the hypothesis of their phylogeographic origin; 3) to define and suggest priorities and strategies for management and conservation, based on the evaluation of genetic similarity relationships among populations with a scattered distribution.

(Financial support for this study (POPSAL Project) was provided by the Fund for Research of the Autonomous Province of Trento – Italy.)

 




ADDRESSES

 

DIANA ALVAREZ

Departamento de Biologia

Facultad de Ciencias

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Cra 7A No 43-82

Bogotá DC

COLOMBIA

dalvarez@javeriana.edu.co

 

ERIC ANDERSON

Department of Integrative Biology

University of California

Berkeley

CA 94720-3140

USA

dr_eriq@uclink.berkeley.edu

Tel: (510) 643 6299 (work) / (510) 524 1831 (home)

Fax: (510) 643-6264

 

ERIKA BAUS

Cardiff University

Main Building, Park Place

PO Box 915

Cardiff CF10 3TL

UNITED KINGDOM

BausE@cf.ac.uk

Fax:  +44 (0) 29 2087 4305

 

MARK BEAUMONT

School of Animal and Microbial Sciences

University of Reading, Whiteknights

PO Box 228

Reading RG6 6AJ

UNITED KINGDOM

m.a.beaumont@reading.ac.uk

Tel: 0118 987 5123 X 7707

Fax: 0118 931 0180

 

PETER BEERLI

Genome Sciences

University of Washington

Box 357730

Seattle 98195-7730

Washington

USA

beerli@gs.washington.edu

Tel: 206 54 38 751

Fax: 206 54 30 754

CSIT Dirac Science Library

Florida State University

Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120,

Florida

USA.

beerli@csit.fsu.edu

Tel: 850-645-1324,

Fax: 850-644-0098


ALBANO BEJA PEREIRA

Génomique des Populations et Biodiversité

UMR CNRS 5553

Université Joseph Fourier

BP 53

38041 GRENOBLE Cedex 9

FRANCE

Albano.Beja-Pereira@ujf-grenoble.fr

Fax:   +351 252 661780

 

LOUIS BERNATCHEZ

Département de Biologie

Université Laval

Pavillon Vachon

Sainte-Foy,

Québec G1K 7P4

CANADA

Louis.Bernatchez@bio.ulaval.ca

Tel: 1 418 656-3402

Fax: 1 418 656-2043

 

PIERRE BERTHIER

Computational and Molecular Population Genetics

Zoologisches Institut

Universitaet Bern

Baltzerstrasse 6

CH-3012 Bern

SWITZERLAND

pierre.berthier@zoo.unibe.ch

Tel: +41 31 631 30 28

Fax: +41 31 631 48 88

http://cmpg.unibe.ch/people/berthier.htm

 

GIORGIO BERTORELLE

Department of Biology

University of Ferrara

via Borsari 46

I-44100 Ferrara

ITALY

ggb@unife.it

Tel: +39 0532 291743

Fax: +39 0532 249761

 

MIKE BRUFORD

Cardiff School of Biosciences

Main Building

Museum Avenue

PO Box 915

Cardiff CF10 3TL

UNITED KINGDOM

BrufordMW@Cardiff.ac.uk

Tel: +44  (0)  29  20 874312

Fax: +44  (0)  29  20 874305

 

GISELLA CACCONE

YIBS- Molecular Systematics and Conservation Genetics Lab.

Environmental Science Center (ESC) 140

Yale University

21 Sachem St.

PO Box 208105

New Haven 06520-8105

Connecticut

USA

adalgisa.caccone@yale.edu

Tel: (203)  432 5259

 

DAVID CARAMELLI

BIOSFERA – Conservation Biology Research and Education

Via del Proconsolo 12

I-50122 Firenze

ITALY

Department of Animal Biology and Genetics

University of Florence

Via del Proconsolo, 12

I-50122 Firenze

david.caramelli@unifi.it

Tel: + 39 055 214049

Fax. +39 055 283358

 

CLAUDIO CIOFI

Yale University

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

165 Prospect Street

New Haven CT 06511

USA

claudio.ciofi@yale.edu

Tel: +1 203 432 3886

Fax: +1 203 432 6066

 

DAVE COLTMAN

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences

University of Sheffield

Sheffield S10 2TN

UNITED KINGDOM

d.coltman@sheffield.ac.uk

Fax: 0114 222 0117

 

BARBARA CRESTANELLO

Centre for Alpine Ecology

I-38040 Viote del Monte Bondone (TN)

ITALY

crestanello@cealp.it

Tel: +39 0461 939532

Fax: +39 0461 948102

Department of Biology

University of Ferrara

via Borsari 46

I-44100 Ferrara

ITALY

Tel: +39 055 291745

Fax: +39 0532 249761

 

FRANCESCA DAVOLI

Centre for Alpine Ecology

I-38040 Viote del Monte Bondone (TN)

ITALY

gialloltremare@tiscalinet.it

Tel: +39 0461 939532

Fax: +39 0461 948102

 

LAURENT EXCOFFIER

Zoological Institute

University of Bern

6 Baltzerstraße

CH-3012 Bern

SWITZERLAND

laurent.excoffier@zoo.unibe.ch

Tel: +41  31  631 30 31

Fax: +41  31  631 48 88

 

ROBERT G FLEISCHER

Department of Systematics Biology

National Museum of Natural History

Smithsonian Institution

3001 Connecticut Ave NW

Washington DC 20008-0551

USA

fleischer.robert@nmnh.si.edu

Tel: 202 673 4842

Fax: 202 673 0040

 

ANGELA FORMIA

School of Biosciences

Cardiff University

Cardiff CF10 3TL

UNITED KINGDOM

formiaa@cardiff.ac.uk

Tel: +44 (0)29 20875073

Fax: +44 (0)29 20874305

 

OSCAR E GAGGIOTTI

Metapopulation Research Group, Dept of Ecology and Systematics

University of Helsinky

PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1)

FINLAND 00014

oscar.gaggiotti@helsinki.fi

Tel: +358  9 191 57752

Fax: +358  9 191 57694

 

PETER GALBUSERA

University of Antwerp

Universiteitsplein 1

B-2610 Wilrijk

BELGIUM

peter.galbusera@ua.ac.be

Fax: +32 (0)3 820 22 62

 

ANDREA GANDOLFI

Istituto Agrario di San Michele a/Adige

Via E. Mach, 1,

38010 San Michele a/Adige (TN)

Italy

andrea.gandolfi@ismaa.it

Tel:+39 0461 650956

 

JOHN CARLOS GARZA

Southwest Fisheries Science Center

University of California

110 Shaffer Road

Santa Cruz CA 95060

USA

carlosjg@CATS.UCSC.EDU

Tel. 831 420 3903

Fax. 831 420 3977

 

STELLA GRANDO

Istituto Agrario di San Michele a/Adige

Via E. Mach, 1,

38010 San Michele a/Adige (TN)

Italy

stella.grando@ismaa.it

Tel:+39 0461 615197

 

BERNHARD GUM

Dipl.-Biologe

TU München, Forstwissenschaftliche Fakultät

Fachgebiet für Wildbiologie und Wildtiermanagement

Am Hochanger 13

D-85354 Freising

GERMANY

gum@wzw.tum.de

Tel.: ++49(0)8161/714606

Fax: ++49(0)8161/714615

 

ELIZABETH A HADLY

Department of Biological Sciences

371 Serra Mall

Stanford University

Stanford CA 94305-5020

USA

hadly@stanford.edu

Tel: 650 725 2655 / 498 4995

Fax: 650 723 0589

http://www.stanford.edu/group/hadlylab

 

HEIDI C HAUFFE

Centre for Alpine Ecology

I-38040 Viote del Monte Bondone (TN)

Italy

hauffe@cealp.it

Tel: +39 0342 770113 / 0461 939555

Fax: +39 0461 948102

 

RUS HOELZEL

University of Durham

Biological Sciences

South Road,

Durham DH1 3LE

UNITED KINGDOM

a.r.hoelzel@dur.ac.uk

Fax: 44 191 334 1201

 

YOUSSEF IDAGHDOUR

Senior Research Assistant

Genetics Laboratory

International Foundation for Conservation and Development of Wildlife

PO Box. 116

Inezgane 80350

MOROCCO

tinoudyali@hotmail.com

Tel: 00 212 48 24 07 68

Fax.: 00 212 48 24 07 66

 

DEUSIDEDITH RWEGASIRA SIMON ISHENGOMA

National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR)

PO Box 950

Tanga

TANZANIA

deusishe@yahoo.com

deusishe@hotmail.com

Fax.:  255 27 264 3869

Fax:  (812) 323 60 51

 

UTE KRYGER

Department of Zoology & Entomology

University of Pretoria

Pretoria 0002

SOUTH AFRICA

Ukryger@zoology.up.ac.za

Fax:  +27 12 362 52 42

 

EVREN KOBAN

Middle East Technical University

Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi

Biyoloji Bölümü, Lab 29

06531 Ankara

TURKEY

evrenkoban@yahoo.com

Fax: +90 312 2101289

 

BERNHARD KRAUS

Institute for Zoology

Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

Kröllwitzer Str. 44

D-06099 Halle (Saale)

GERMANY

kraus@zoologie.uni-halle.de

Fax: +49 345 5527264

Tel: +49 345 5526235

 

CARLO LARGIADER

CMPG (Computational and Molecular Population Genetics lab)

Abteilung Populationsgenetik

Zoologisches Institut - Universitaet Bern

Baltzerstrasse 6

CH-3012 Bern

SWITZERLAND

largiader@zoo.unibe.ch

Tel: +41 31 631 45 13/11

Fax: +41 31 631 31 88

http://cmpg.unibe.ch/people/largiader.htm

 

GORDON LUIKART

Laboratoire de Biologie des Populations d'Altitude (LBPA)

Biologie D Salle 311

BP 53 - 38041

Grenoble cedex 9

FRANCE

Gordon.Luikart@ujf-grenoble.fr

Tel: +33  4 76 63 56 07 / 51 46 00

Fax: +33  4 76 51 42 79

 

MICHEL C MILINKOVITCH

Unit of Evolutionary Genetics

Inst. Of Molecular Biology & Medicine

Free University of Brussels (ULB)

cp 300, Rue Jeener & Brachet, 12

B-6041 Gosselies

BELGIUM

mcmilink@ulb.ac.be

Tel: +32  2 650 9956 / 9967 / 9968

Fax: +32  2 650 9950

 

PETER MIKULÍČEK

Department of Population Biology

Institute of Vertebrate Biology

Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

CZ-675 02 Studenec 122

CZECH REPUBLIC

Department of Zoology

Biodiversity Research Group

Charles University

Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Prague 2

CZECH REPUBLIC

mikulice@natur.cuni.cz; petermikulicek@pobox.sk

 

PHILLIP A MORIN

Protected Resources Division

Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC)

National Marine Fisheries Service

8604 La Jolla Shores Dr

La Jolla CA 92037

USA

Phillip.Morin@noaa.gov

Tel: 858 546 7165

Fax: 858 546 7003

 

ROBIN FA MORITZ

Institute for Zoology

Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

Kröllwitzer Str. 44

D-06099 Halle (Saale)

GERMANY

r.moritz@zoologie.uni-halle.de

Fax: +49-345-5527264

 

ROB OGDEN

Wildlife DNA Services Limited

Brambell Building

Deiniol Road

University of Wales

Bangor, LL57 2UW

UNITED KINGDOM

rob-ogden@wdnas.com

Fax: +44 1248 371644

 

ELENA PECCHIOLI

Centre for Alpine Ecology

I-38040 Viote del Monte Bondone (TN)

Italy

pecchioli@cealp.it

Tel: +39 0461 939532

Fax: +39 0461 948102

Department of Biology

University of Ferrara

via Borsari 46

I-44100 Ferrara

ITALY

Tel: +39 0532 291745

Fax: +39 0532 249761

 

MASSIMO PIERPAOLI

Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica

Via Ca' Fornacetta 9

I-40064 Ozzano Emilia (BO)

ITALY

pierpaoli@mclink.it

Tel: +39 051 6512253 / 257

 

DAVID POSADA

Departemento de Bioquimica, Genetica e Inmunologia

Faculdad de Ciencas

Universidad de Vigo

Vigo 36200

SPAIN

dposada@evolgenics.com

Tel: +34  625 587976

 

CRAIG PRIMMER

Department of Ecology and Systematics

Division of Population Biology

P.O. Box 65 (Biocentre 3, Viikinkaari 1)

FIN-00014 University of Helsinki

FINLAND

craig.primmer@helsinki.fi

Tel: 358  9 191 57685

Fax: 358  9 191 57847

 

ETTORE RANDI

Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica

Via cá Fornacetta 9

40064 Ozzano dell' Emilia (Bologna)

ITALY

met0217@iperbole.bologna.it

Tel: 051 65 12 111

Fax: 051 79 66 28

 

MANUEL RUEDI

Natural History Museum of Geneva

Route de Malagnou 1

CH-1208 Genčve

SWITZERLAND

manuel.ruedi@mhn.ville-ge.ch

Fax: +41 22 418 63.01

 

SÉBASTIEN REGNAUT

LBC - Inst. of Ecology

University of Lausanne

Bat Biol

CH-1015 Dorigny

SWITZERLAND

sebastien.regnaut@ie-zea.unil.ch

 

KATHRYN M RODRÍGUEZ -CLARK

Laboratorio de Ecología y Genética de Poblaciones

Centro de Ecología

Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas

Apartado 21827

Caracas 1020-A

VENEZUELA

kate@sigmaxi.org

Tel:  +58 212 504 1889

Fax: +58 212 504 1617

 

MANUEL RUIZ-GARCIA

Departamento de Biologia

Facultad de Ciencias

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Cra 7A  No 43-82

Bogotá DC

COLOMBIA

mruiz@javeriana.edu.co

 

WALTER SALZBURGER

Institute of Evolutionary Biology

Department of Biology

PO Box M617

University Konstanz

D-78457 Konstanz

GERMANY

Walter.Salzburger@uni-konstanz.de

http://www.evolutionsbiologie.uni-konstanz.de/labmembers/walter/ (new!)

Tel: +49 (0) 7531 88 4304

Cell: +49 151 127 22 378

Fax: +49 (0) 7531 88 3018

 

VALERIO SBORDONI

Department of Biology

Tor Vergata University

00133 Roma

ITALY

valerio.sbordoni@uniroma2.it

Tel: 06  7259 59 51/8; 06  20 42 76 53

Fax: 06  20 26 189; 06  72 59 59 65

 

GERNOT SEGELBACHER

Max Planck Research Centre for Ornithology

Vogelwarte Radolfzell

Schlossallee 2

D-78315 Radolfzell

GERMANY

segelbac@vowa.ornithol.mpg.de

Tel: +49 77 32 15 01 62

Fax: +49 77 32 15 01 69

http://vowa.ornithol.mpg.de/

 

DAVID TALLMON

LECA

Université Joseph Fourier

F-38041 BP53 Cedex 9, Grenoble

FRANCE

dtallmon42@yahoo.com

Fax: +33 04 76 51 42 79

 

SYLVAIN URSENBACHER

Laboratoire de Biologie de la Conservation (LBC)

Institut d'Ecologie

Bât. de Biologie

CH-1015 Lausanne

SWITZERLAND

Sylvain.Ursenbacher@ie-zea.unil.ch

http://www.unil.ch/lbc

Tel: +41 (0) 21 692 41 63

Fax: +41 (0) 21 692 41 65

 

JUHA-PEKKA VÄHÄ

University of Helsinki

Department of Ecology and Systematics

P.O. Box 65

00014 University of Helsinki

FINLAND

juha-pekka.vaha@helsinki.fi

Fax: +358 9 191 57694

 

JEROEN VAN HOUDT

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Ch de Bériotstraat 32,

B-3000 Leuven

Belgium

Jeroen.VanHoudt@bio.kuleuven.ac.be

Tel: +32(0)16 32 45 75

 

ADRIAN MUNGUIA VEGA

Northwest Biological Research Center, CIBNOR

Mar Bermejo No 195

Colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita

CP 23090

La Paz, Baja California Sur

MEXICO

airdrian@cibnor.mx , airdrian@hotmail.com

Tel:  +(52) 612-12-30450

Fax.: + (52) 612-12-53625

 

CRISTIANO VERNESI

Department of Biology

University of Ferrara

via Borsari 46

I-44100 Ferrara

ITALY

vrc@unife.it

Tel: +39 0532 291745

Fax: +39 0532 249761

 

CARLES VILŔ

Department of Evolutionary Biology

Uppsala University

Norbyvägen 18D

S-752 36 Uppsala

SWEDEN

carles.vila@ebc.uu.se

Tel: +46 18 4716464

Fax: +46 18 4716310

 

PETER WANDELER

Institute of Zoology

Zoological Society of London

Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY

UNITED KINGDOM

peter.wandeler@ioz.ac.uk

http://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/ioz/index.htm

Tel: +44 (207) 449 6621




COMMITTEES

 

Scientific Committee

Giorgio Bertorelle, University of Ferrara, Italy

Mike Bruford, University of Cardiff, UK

Claudio Chemini, CEA, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

Heidi Hauffe, CEA, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

Cristiano Vernesi, University of Ferrara, Italy

 

Organizing Committee

President: Gianni Nicolini, Director of the Centre for Alpine Ecology, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

 

Annalisa Losa, CEA, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

 

Faunagen Project Group:

Giorgio Bertorelle, University of Ferrara, Italy

David Caramelli, Association Biosfera, Firenze, Italy

Barbara Crestanello, CEA, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

Francesca Davoli, CEA, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

Heidi Hauffe, CEA, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

Elena Pecchioli, CEA, Viote del Monte Bondone, Trento, Italy

Cristiano Vernesi, University of Ferrara, Italy